I have some questions about Plato, holler if you can help me out.
@Cyborgneticz Plato was a dumbass and deserved to get bigtimed by Aristotle amongst medieval scholars.
thrilling! do tell..
@nee When Plato talks about the city-soul connection - what part of the city accounts for the appetitive and spirited portions of the soul?
you mean if philosophers stand for reason, which group, then, stands for spirit and which for desire? I think 'the people' in broader sense stand for desire/appetitive/the libidinal. And the spirit comes up in a regulatory capacity towards the libidinal, so the executive power, the police in a sense.
@nee okay so philosophers and potential guardians act as reason then the general populace are the other aspects of the soul which must be controlled by the reasonable aspect of the city which is separate?
So in Plato's sense of the ideal city, the spirited (in the sense of strength/prone to anger/action/activity/executive/protective) work together with the reasonable, to benevolently rule over raw desire (the people). Less ideal are the cases where the θυμοειδές-spirited joins up with desire instead of reason. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy is less helpful with this than I would have thought.
@nee Would that be the military aspect of the city?
Yeah I looked at the encyclopedia and was dismayed. Usually they are nice for a prep before going into a text.
That would depend on the questions. I don't think anyone (except absolute Plato-experts) can decide whether or not to holler without knowing a bit more. Care to elabourate?
@hirnbloggade I think I got it!
Oh yeah, now I can see the rest of the thread, too. Sorry, it's the curse of small instances. Glad you found help.
@hirnbloggade I feel that. It's nice to have a response to my advisor And better notes for comps
NOTICE: Registration on scholar.social is open to anyone who is willing to abide by our Community Standards. Email scholar dot social at protonmail dot com if you want an invite!
Scholar Social is a microblogging platform for researchers, grad students, librarians, archivists, undergrads, academically inclined high schoolers, educators of all levels, journal editors, research assistants, professors, administrators—anyone involved in academia who is willing to engage with others respectfully.
We strive to be a safe space for queer people and other minorities in academia, recognizing that there can only be academic freedom where the existence and validity of interlocutors' identities is taken as axiomatic.
"An academic microblog that you can be proud to put on the last slide of a presentation at a conference"
(Participation is, of course, optional)
Scholar Social features a monthly "official" journal club, in which we try to read and comment on a paper of interest.
Any user of Scholar Social can suggest an article by sending the DOI by direct message to @firstname.lastname@example.org and one will be chosen by random lottery on the last day of the month. We ask that you only submit articles that are from *outside* your own field of study to try to ensure that the papers we read are accessible and interesting to non-experts.