Good and bad results from an academic journal submission 

Good:

🍍 Fast desk-rejections
🍍 Rejections that take a little longer, but have constructive reviews

Bad:

🍍 Very long desk-rejections without review feedback
🍍 Reviews that are mean-spirited
🍍 Reviews that do not reflect an honest attempt to engage with the submission

Follow

Good and bad results from an academic journal submission 

@bgcarlisle I love when reviewers say << THIS IS SO GOOD BUT ALSO TERRIBLE >> which I've gotten before

Good and bad results from an academic journal submission 

@Cyborgneticz "Groundbreaking. Revolutionary idea. Rejected."

Good and bad results from an academic journal submission 

@bgcarlisle I swear to God sometimes they don't know how to communicate like normal human beings.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Scholar Social

Scholar Social is a microblogging platform for researchers, grad students, librarians, archivists, undergrads, academically inclined high schoolers, educators of all levels, journal editors, research assistants, professors, administrators—anyone involved in academia who is willing to engage with others respectfully.