Good and bad results from an academic journal submission 

Good:

🍍 Fast desk-rejections
🍍 Rejections that take a little longer, but have constructive reviews

Bad:

🍍 Very long desk-rejections without review feedback
🍍 Reviews that are mean-spirited
🍍 Reviews that do not reflect an honest attempt to engage with the submission

Good and bad results from an academic journal submission 

@bgcarlisle I love when reviewers say << THIS IS SO GOOD BUT ALSO TERRIBLE >> which I've gotten before

Good and bad results from an academic journal submission 

@Cyborgneticz "Groundbreaking. Revolutionary idea. Rejected."

Follow

Good and bad results from an academic journal submission 

@bgcarlisle I swear to God sometimes they don't know how to communicate like normal human beings.

Β· Web Β· 0 Β· 0 Β· 3
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Scholar Social

Scholar Social is a microblogging platform for researchers, grad students, librarians, archivists, undergrads, academically inclined high schoolers, educators of all levels, journal editors, research assistants, professors, administratorsβ€”anyone involved in academia who is willing to engage with others respectfully.