@lbs Eleven national funders are already involved, which I think is quite a lot! Furthermore, e.g. Germany's couldn't take part due to a conflict with their constitutions.
- The Netherlands
- The United Kingdom
@lbs In my opinion, what's most relevant is that these countries represent a significant chunk of research output. In other words, if journals like Nature or Science don't flip to Open Access, they will miss out on a lot of quality content and hence suffer in reputation.
If they *do* flip to Open Access, everyone benefits. In other words, it's not necessary for every country to take part.
@Flockademic That's an interesting point, thanks! Also, I was specifically wondering about Germany, it's interesting that they couldn't take part due to constitutions. Do you have any more infos or a resource on that?
@lbs That was mentioned in this article - it's in Dutch though, but Google Translate appears accurate: https://www.scienceguide.nl/2018/09/nwo-wil-weg-van-de-impact-factor/
The relevant quote, by the director of the Dutch scientific organisation:
> For example, in Germany, academic freedom has been enshrined in the constitution. It is defined broady enough to include full freedom for researchers to pick their publication venue. If a researcher were to sue for the right to publish in a paywalled journal, he will win.
@Flockademic Very interesting, thanks!
Scholar Social is a microblogging platform for researchers, grad students, librarians, archivists, undergrads, academically inclined high schoolers, educators of all levels, journal editors, research assistants, professors, administrators—anyone involved in academia who is willing to engage with others respectfully. Read more ...