Tell me about your submissions and resubmissions! I just got back an R&R, just sent back an R&R and submitted another article about fifteen minutes ago.
The most recent one was an adventure in a quantitative scholar writing a piece on Marx's human emancipation sooooooo that was new.
lol @ todl instead of told. Okay so maybe my grammar is poor
„The exposure of prominent male feminists as hypocritical jerks in their private lives happens so often that it’s not just a familiar narrative, but an SNL punchline.“ Kat Rosenfield‘s marvellous piece in the “good guys” in times of #MeToo. https://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-life-and-religion/278837/birth-of-the-cool-guy
Submission number two! Trying to make 2019 a real big year for the CV #somebodypublishmeplease
This is super cute. Neat little tool to teach central-limit theorem to students. Could be a cute gift for any stats person in your life (or for yourself if that stats person is you).
If you submit a review for a paper and all it says is, "We already know this" (or something similar) but don't provide citations you should be banned from reviewing papers.
If we already knew this, do you think I'd've written it ya twit? Why don't you check my lit review where it shows the existing research _doesn't_ already know this.
(Reviewer 2 recommended R&R with minor revisions....)
PhD Candidate - American Politics
Sports / Video Games / Politics / Marx / Memes
Scholar Social is a microblogging platform for researchers, grad students, librarians, archivists, undergrads, academically inclined high schoolers, educators of all levels, journal editors, research assistants, professors, administrators—anyone involved in academia who is willing to engage with others respectfully. Read more ...