Also, this paper by Jackson Kernion is /really/ good: http://jacksonkernion.com/files/Kernion%20-%20Strange%20Experience.pdf
@PhilDork Just got engaged to my boyfriend of 2.5 years the other day, as it were 👬🏳️🌈♂️♂️
@logarithmic_function Biology, for the most part, does not influence my philosophy; not because I think it is unimportant, but rather because my knowledge of it is severely limited, thus I cannot bear genuine claim to knowledge about it without being disingenuous. As for your "Bonus Question", I'm not sure. To engage in any discussion about the nature of consciousness the Biologist will have to make, either implicitly or explicitly, an ontological claim and/or metaphysical world view.
@RedBard Moreover, unlike humans (so I believe), robots/AI do not possess Qualia, nor do they possess "felt" or "qualitative" experiences and as so the relationship would be fundamentally distinct from relationships that exist between humans, as participants in "normal" human/sentient relationships are able to acknowledge each other's "felt" experiences through observation of speech acts, external acts and behaviours (i.e. crying, laughing), and so forth. I'm not sure such is the case with AI
@RedBard However, based on the former claim - the presumption that /if/ a robot were to hold equal emotional and logical intelligence to a human - and we accept the Three Laws, I personally think it is ethical, so long as it does not impede on the liberty or wellbeing of others, which it likely won't. Questions arise, however, as to whether such a relationship is as "natural" or "genuine" as a relationship existing between two human and/or sentient beings
@RedBard Based on the latter claim, I am not entirely sure the intelligence robots hold is analogous to that of an intelligent human. There is a conceptual distinction to be made between the ability of robots/AI to be able to /function/ at a supreme level and bearing claim to "intelligence"
Hey hey! I am an undergraduate student from Canada studying Philosophy, and eventually I will be completing a minor in Cognitive Science as well. I'm not entirely sure what to say here? I like philosophy of mind, philosophy of Artificial Intelligence, feminist philosophy, and just about every aspect of virtue theory! Just looking for discussion partners concerning anything philosophy/politics/critical race theory/etc. :)
Canadian philosophy student. He/him. 🏳️🌈 "Varus, give me back my legions!"
Scholar Social is a microblogging platform for researchers, grad students, librarians, archivists, undergrads, academically inclined high schoolers, educators of all levels, journal editors, research assistants, professors, administrators—anyone involved in academia who is willing to engage with others respectfully.
We strive to be a safe space for queer people and other minorities in academia, recognizing that there can only be academic freedom where the existence and validity of interlocutors' identities is taken as axiomatic.
"An academic microblog that you can be proud to put on the last slide of a presentation at a conference"
(Participation is, of course, optional)
Scholar Social features a monthly "official" journal club, in which we try to read and comment on a paper of interest.
Any user of Scholar Social can suggest an article by sending the DOI by direct message to @email@example.com and one will be chosen by random lottery on the last day of the month. We ask that you only submit articles that are from *outside* your own field of study to try to ensure that the papers we read are accessible and interesting to non-experts.