@reality2cast @katherined @dsearls EmanciPay sounds a lot like the #value4value implementation that lets you stream satoshis or send boosts to podcasters that's implemented in the value tag in the new podcast namespace that @adam & @dave are working on at the the podcast index and the podcasting 2.0 movement summarised here: https://podcode.co/podcasting-2point0/
Ignition: An Informal History of Liquid Rocket Propellants (1972) [pdf] - https://library.sciencemadness.org/library/books/ignition.pdf
I mentioned my audiobook set-up before I have an update I'm now using https://www.audiobookshelf.org/ Hosted on my TrueNAS SCALE box. openaudible is unfortunately no longer open but still convenient for removing DRM from Audible books, Though I've found audiobookstore.com to have a pretty complete library and actually sell you audiobooks without DRM instead of 'selling' you the chance to ask for their permission to read your own books.
I recently ran a workshop on writing performant R code you can find the slides at: https://richardjacton.github.io/performantR/Performant_R.html
I took a very wide overview of the subject covering profiling and benchmarking, vectorising, parallelism, Rcpp, and working with larger than memory datasets as well as caching of computationally results with compressed data object outputs and pipeline management tools. There are links to further reading/watching in the presenter notes and the git repo https://github.com/RichardJActon/performantR.
Last week, in my course on information seeking/retrieval, I dedicated a class to watch "Paywall: The Business of Scholarship"
I explained that now I can chose to publish only in OA journals and that I decline reviews if the journal is not OA. But during my PhD most of the times I felt forced to publish in "journals with the highest impact factor" and not OA due to the criteria of the University. I like the quote by Lars Bjørnshauge in the capture attached:
Tech I want cobbled together into a crazy awesome Linux system:
- Coreboot firmware with HEADS for tamper evident boot
- Guix OS with ZFS on root using zectl or ZFSBootMenu
- shavee or something like it to encrypt my ZFS datasets with my hardware keys
- a ZFS snapshot & sync management tool like Jim Salter's sanoid/syncoid
- pipewire, wayland & KDE Plasma desktop
- flatpaks for any weird proprietary shiz I might be obliged to use
I enjoy the evidence_im_nuts -= 1 sensation of finding an old paper that says more or less exactly what I've been banging on about for years just in slightly different words. I get that from this paper: Natural selection and immortality
by Antoine Danchin https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2700247/
@reality2cast An approach to getting around the issue of facilitating legitimate anonymous accounts could be endorsements by accounts with verified identity e.g. a filter that lets you see unverified accounts with >n endorsements from verified accounts. This could also work for bots, they need to be endorsed by >n real humans to show up in your feed if you set a filter.
@reality2cast following up on the mastadon conversation in episode 109 It'd be great to see mastadon/activitypub supporting some of the self sovereign identity stuff you've discussed before in place of twitter verification. But with more granularity you could have unverified, verified real human, real human whose name is X and some decision about what verification methods a given instance or user trusts to make those claims. You could also filter based on these.
reproducibility starts from the tools employed. packaging, knowledge sharing, and experimental frameworks are as necessary to open science as sharing data and analysis code -- and they make it possible. not sure that's reflected in our commitment to sustainable, shared tooling.
Scientists must share their datasets and source code at the article submission stage, not after publication as it is now. #science #publication #reproducibility #openscience
📄 Heyard & Held (2022) When should data and code be made available? Significance 19:4–5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1740-9713.01623
I just put up a short post detailing my problems with multi-panel figures in the academic literature. It also covers how we can do better and some predictions to test my hypothesis that this is a problem and why.
Esoteric as all this stuff might be, it really worries me. Switching to a default assumption that our computers should control us, not the other way around, is a terrifying, dystopian nightmare. It's a live issue: Apple is telling Congress this *right now*:
Royal Society cautions against censorship of scientific misinformation online - https://royalsociety.org/news/2022/01/scientific-misinformation-report/
My latest blog post on free-software, directed to a specific audience but might be of broader interest. https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/SoqQ3ShW2xmdpjeZ7/why-rationalists-should-care-more-about-free-software
Scientist, Bioinformatician, R enthusiast
Scholar Social is a microblogging platform for researchers, grad students, librarians, archivists, undergrads, academically inclined high schoolers, educators of all levels, journal editors, research assistants, professors, administrators—anyone involved in academia who is willing to engage with others respectfully.