@mplouffe Do you think that among Econ scholars it's common that they read Journal of Econ Lit articles for fun? I like the critical reviews of whole bodies of literature on topics that I haven't touched much before.

@bthall @mplouffe I mean, in a sense that's how I understand how rational expectations models jumped over from agricultural economics to macro economic policy in the 70s

image/svg+xml Follow

@bthall @mplouffe I honestly also like reading out of discipline reviews also. Nothing like reading how biologists describe understandings of populations or similar to give perspective.

Often that perspective is that humans are idiosyncratic... but that's not a bad perspective.

@bthall @mplouffe I'd hope it'd humble Macroeconomists a bit more if they understood their roots out of stuff like "NORTH AMERICAN HOG SUPPLY: A COMPARISON OF GEOMETRIC AND POLYNOMIAL DISTRIBUTED LAG MODELS" and similar. Not to hate, but gives context.

doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7976.19

@bthall @mplouffe Although perhaps that article specifically a bad example.

Muth had written in the 60s (61 iirc?), so Meilke and co. weren't direct forbears - they're like 2/3rd gen adaptive expectations scholars.

Prob go back to Ezekiel, Nerlove adaptive expectations work which Muth was a response to.

@WilliamConey @bthall I'm pretty sure anything that humbles macroeconomists is a good thing 😝 😈

@WilliamConey @bthall This is why I enjoy fisheries management. Some overlap, lots of different points of view.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Scholar Social

Federated microblogging for academics

Scholar Social is a microblogging platform for researchers, grad students, librarians, archivists, undergrads, academically inclined high schoolers, educators of all levels, journal editors, research assistants, professors, administrators—anyone involved in academia who is willing to engage with others respectfully.

We strive to be a safe space for queer people and other minorities, recognizing that there can only be academic freedom where the existence and validity of interlocutors' identities is taken as axiomatic.

"An academic microblog that you can be proud to put on the last slide of a presentation at a conference"

"Official" monthly journal club!

(Participation is, of course, optional)

Scholar Social features a monthly "official" journal club, in which we try to read and comment on a paper of interest.

Any user of Scholar Social can suggest an article by sending the DOI by direct message to @socrates@scholar.social and one will be chosen by random lottery on the last day of the month. We ask that you only submit articles that are from *outside* your own field of study to try to ensure that the papers we read are accessible and interesting to non-experts.

Read more ...