Show more

Academic journal web design fail 

@mmin Tämä vaikuttaa lupaavalta tavalta kuvata asioiden loogisia suhteita. Varmasti luettavampaa kuin filosofien tyypillinen syntaksi.

Generating argumentation maps by writing the logical structure of an argument: argdown.org/

Interesting stuff. This could also be used for digging into arguments and assumptions about .

I just learned about the National Coalition of Independent Scholars. Are any of you here members of it or know people that are members of it?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National

A couple years ago I saw a visualization of what derivatives in calculus are/mean or how they kinda work, and another visualization regarding how this same thing plays out with the expansion and contraction in size of an object (a square, I think), and ever since I seem to have been able to think in a much more rich and visual way. Recently I've been able to rotate objects in my mind, a thing that I don't recall ever being able to do or really trying to do. :)

Open-mindedness... "How Intellectual Humility Can Make Us More Curious, Reflective & Able to Learn More: Read the Findings of a New Study" openculture.com/2019/07/how-in

The traditional method for forced rhubarb goes back nearly 200 years.

Rhubarb is planted in fields, fertilised well with manure, and left to grow pretty much wild for 2 years. During this time, it'll store a ton of energy in its roots as carbohydrates. Then at the start of Winter, the rhubarb is moved somewhere warm and completely dark.

In the darkness, the plants start to grow vivaciously, converting those carbs into sugars. As a result, it's sweeter and more tender than Summer rhubarb.

I found what appears to be a major data entry error in the Drugs@FDA database

Or rather, about 1400 data entry errors

If you have reproducibility issues with Jupyter notebooks you should give a shot to Nextjournal (nextjournal.com/)

Here's a great presentation of the platform by the company CEO

youtu.be/MI9tl-3kNS0

Academic life, that means conferences. They are an important part of science: Many of my collaboration projects were thought up at a conference or brought into a public form for one. We may (and should) find other ways to present our work and network with potential new colleagues in the future, but for now it means I sit at the airport to fly half around the globe and back to meet other people doing the same, which is clearly not sustainable. What ideas for alternatives are out there?

Econ, social group decision making, inequalities 

It's always fascinating to hear someone utter an idea or set of #ideas that you've had but not heard others talk about. Yesterday, I had an experience like that while listening to the #podcast episode below. The guest and I seem to both want for more #economics #scholars to think in a what-if manner and make real the things that they suspect would provide significant societal benefits. Sort of entrepreneurial scholasticism.

164: Nicholas Gruen on Data Sharing and Reform in Economic Thinking by Economic Rockstar
https://player.fm/1tZMUx #nowplaying

@bthall if i'm not mistaken, this already exists. for example, if you're in a julia shell, you can type

?≥

and you get this:
```
help?> ≥
"≥" can be typed by \ge<tab>
search: ≥

>=(x, y)
≥(x,y)

Greater-than-or-equals comparison operator. Falls back to y <= x.

Examples
≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡

julia> 'a' >= 'b'
false

julia> 7 ≥ 7 ≥ 3
true

julia> "abc" ≥ "abc"
true

julia> 5 >= 3
true
```

: Docstrings for math functions/operations. With you can use Unicode, so you could even use general purpose symbols for function names.

@bthall I would try visualising the data points from both perspectives. I've found RapidMiner a good software (non free for productive purposes) for doing this. It allows you to apply most data science algorithms, visualize them and find connections or new data points. Once I find a good representation of my data, I can move the actual implementation to something more efficient (R, Numpy, scikit, etc)

For people here familiar with or , have you heard of methods that bring together the two approaches?

For analyzing my wiki's contents I could analyze the explicit linkages between articles with graph theory and the implicit linkages with text mining, but I wonder about how much better it'd be to analyze both graphs. I think that in textmining creates a graph representation anyway, so it may just require tools for integrating two related graphs.

Agricultural Econ / Sociology Question 

I'm current tinkering with the #Wallabag #android app to see if I can get #MathJax rendering working in it to nicely render mathematical equations written in #LaTeX. So far I have the base script running on my phone, but I didn't realize that I need to load in a bunch of additional files to get it to work, so I'm working on getting the additional files loaded in. Not bad progress for a guy that barely understands #AndroidStudio. :D
Show more
Scholar Social

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!