If you have ever wanted to know how low a predatory journal will go in publishing a paper, check this collection: https://figshare.com/articles/Stinging_the_Predators_A_collection_of_papers_that_should_never_have_been_published/5248264 ICYMI
@f_loki lucky! I've got an Android tablet, so no such luck for me.
@f_loki xournal is great! I use it for marking digital submissions. The only thing I miss is a tablet counterpart.
OMG my fingers ... Thanks for sharing,<exclamation mark>*** not a question
@jorge can't wait to read it!
What part wasn't surprising? Show more
When you say that isn't surprising, what's your take here? That the police didn't find evidence (lack of investigation not surprising) or that there wasn't evidence (and perhaps she was being dishonest)? Or is it the assumption that fear can only be bred through physical abuse?
Thanks for sharing?
What about R2? I usually find something Long the lines of:
R1: pedestrian operations are described in excessive detail. Reduce the manuscript by half.
R2: I do not understand the method. They should be explained in more detail.
@WilliamConey welcome from a fellow Canuck. I'll be interested to see some of your research.
@eredondo still a super important part of the action needed. That's very cool work. I'll be interested to follow your updates.
#published! Our new article on the impact of missing data in a monthly series. Applied here to temperature data but I think it is widely applicable. https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joc.5801 #openacess #science
@ibull Is it not worse when it was published weeks ago.
@drarp, great question. I didn't encounter any denial in Peru. I can think of a number of reasons why this might be—I think probably Peru is typically cast as a victim of CC, not perpetrator, so political incentive to deny is small, versus potential assistance to adapt. What I did find though is a lot of misinformation re: what counts as CC. e.g. El Niño, cyclical occurence and still not sure what the link to CC looks like. Or a big rain storm in the rainforest, probably not CC.
Climate guy. Likes to do stuff with data. Open is good.
NOTICE: Registration on scholar.social will be by invitation only from 2019 March 27 to 2019 April 3. (The administrator is defending their doctoral thesis on 2019 April 2, and wants to reduce the chances of surprises leading up to that date. Email scholar dot social at protonmail dot com if you want an invite.)
Scholar Social is a microblogging platform for researchers, grad students, librarians, archivists, undergrads, academically inclined high schoolers, educators of all levels, journal editors, research assistants, professors, administrators—anyone involved in academia who is willing to engage with others respectfully.
We strive to be a safe space for queer people and other minorities in academia, recognizing that there can only be academic freedom where the existence and validity of interlocutors' identities is taken as axiomatic.
"An academic microblog that you can be proud to put on the last slide of a presentation at a conference"
(Participation is, of course, optional)
Scholar Social features a monthly "official" journal club, in which we try to read and comment on a paper of interest.
Any user of Scholar Social can suggest an article by sending the DOI by direct message to @email@example.com and one will be chosen by random lottery on the last day of the month. We ask that you only submit articles that are from *outside* your own field of study to try to ensure that the papers we read are accessible and interesting to non-experts.