@jc I'd start with Authorea, since that is a service specifically aimed towards academic writing. And the possibility to link other git repositories makes offline writing in your favourite editor possible.

@drbjork @jc Tried both Authorea and Overleaf. I like the first more, but for pure LaTex Overleaf is probably better.

@jaranta
@drbjork @jc

So far, my team has not needed anything more complicated that git. However, typically no more than say three people are working on a single document simultaneously.

@jaranta @drbjork in your use, did you by any chance try their journal submission integrations?

@jc @drbjork I didn't, because they didn't include any of the journals I publish in. Having a direct submission from the writing platform does sound really useful.

@drbjork
Overleaf has good git integration as well. This is one reason I like it: I can keep my familiar emacs-based workflow and collaborate with others who prefer the web interface.
@jc

@drbjork @jc
One thing I'd really like to see in both is #R support. Right now my solution is to generate tables and plots in R locally and export them to #LaTeX files that are included in the document. #git and offline workflow make this process fairly smooth, but it would be slicker still if the analysis could be rerun in #Overleaf, especially for co-authors who are not comfortable with using git.

@hazybluedot @drbjork Interesting, I just searched on their site and they say that they're working on making R code executable https://www.overleaf.com/help/71-how-do-i-include-sections-of-r-code-within-my-latex-document