@nikostr depends on how you compare. One strength of WikiPathways is the community aspect, another the diversity in integrations, a third the license. Where possible, we collaborate. We're soon releasing our new platform, making it better, faster. Content wise, the most recent comparison is a bit dated, but check the one but last article, I think
@nikostr KEGG and BioCyc do not have the most interoperable license. That makes reusing and integration of that content harder. But both are content wise very important sources still
Scholar Social is a microblogging platform for researchers, grad students, librarians, archivists, undergrads, academically inclined high schoolers, educators of all levels, journal editors, research assistants, professors, administrators—anyone involved in academia who is willing to engage with others respectfully.