Impact factor abandoned by Dutch university in hiring and promotion decisions — Nature
A Dutch university says it is formally abandoning the impact factor — a standard measure of scientific success — in all hiring and promotion decisions. By early 2022, every department at Utrecht University in the Netherlands will judge its scholars by other standards, including their commitment to teamwork and their efforts to promote open science, says Paul Boselie, a governance researcher and the project leader for the university’s new Recognition and Rewards scheme. “Impact factors don’t really reflect the quality of an individual researcher or academic,” he says. “We have a strong belief that something has to change, and abandoning the impact factor is one of those changes.”
@arcans of course I didn't come up with this, but I have no scientific support for this consideration, just informal discussions and the personal experience and intuition. But it looks like a general law. Does anybody studying processes, incentives and evaluation have related scientific evidence to back a reform proposal?
@arcans here is my start for examples of how the publishing rewards/punishment system has failed https://www.nature.com/articles/s41393-017-0057-8 I would love to find a community actually involved in evidence-based activism to push reforms in academia (local university, scientific editors, policy makers, European union / Federal funding / similar international funding bodies).
Scholar Social is a microblogging platform for researchers, grad students, librarians, archivists, undergrads, academically inclined high schoolers, educators of all levels, journal editors, research assistants, professors, administrators—anyone involved in academia who is willing to engage with others respectfully.