image/svg+xml Follow

Why do citations still need to have archaic abbreviated formats like J. Anal. Chem. (27)314, p5483-5489 when we could just all agree to use DOI numbers instead? First author, year, DOI would be way simpler, I think.

Not that I dislike physical copies of things, mind you. But how many people honestly look things up without using a computer-aided database of some kind?

@invaderxan loads of stuff don’t have DOI though.

I’m thinking about every article that instead has ISSN ####-####.

There are a LOT of articles in EdTech coming from Turkey (as an example) that do not have DOI.

@afterthehyphen
A fair point. I'll admit, I'm biased working in physics where everything has a DOI.

But seeing as everything is digitally catalogued somewhere, it would make things a lot easier if we could simply use those catalogue numbers. I see no trouble with using a combination of DOI/ISSN/ISBN/any other where available. It's a string of forgettable characters which no one really reads either way.

@invaderxan I totally agree, I think a unified system for simplified documentation would be incredible!

@invaderxan Referencing journal / publication names give the benefit also of credibility - not necessarily of huge benefit for someone out of a field, but if I know what a specific bent / focus of a journal is, this does help me in decision making to spend time to read or not.

@invaderxan In my field we use the full name. Paper is cheap, bits are even cheaper, and abbreviations are a barrier to access (knowing them is 'hidden knowledge' passed from teacher to student within a community). There are many problems with DOIs, like proprietary journals which 'helpfully' provide a DOI for their paywalled version not the open one you can get elsewhere.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Scholar Social

NOTICE: Registration on scholar.social is open to anyone who is willing to abide by our Community Standards. Email scholar dot social at protonmail dot com if you want an invite!

Federated microblogging for academics

Scholar Social is a microblogging platform for researchers, grad students, librarians, archivists, undergrads, academically inclined high schoolers, educators of all levels, journal editors, research assistants, professors, administrators—anyone involved in academia who is willing to engage with others respectfully.

We strive to be a safe space for queer people and other minorities in academia, recognizing that there can only be academic freedom where the existence and validity of interlocutors' identities is taken as axiomatic.

"An academic microblog that you can be proud to put on the last slide of a presentation at a conference"

"Official" monthly journal club!

(Participation is, of course, optional)

Scholar Social features a monthly "official" journal club, in which we try to read and comment on a paper of interest.

Any user of Scholar Social can suggest an article by sending the DOI by direct message to @socrates@scholar.social and one will be chosen by random lottery on the last day of the month. We ask that you only submit articles that are from *outside* your own field of study to try to ensure that the papers we read are accessible and interesting to non-experts.

Read more ...