I'm only tangentially familiar with the whole digital humanities and computational literary studies fields. This seems like a very damning take on the approach.
@jaranta If you'd be interested in a response, Scott W is one of the best-informed DH folks I know of. He seems to think that she makes some good points but her piece suffers from not engaging with DH's own history of critique: https://twitter.com/scott_bot/status/1111034030500265985?s=21
@foureyedsoul I am! Thanks for sharing!
@jaranta Speaking of responses, Critical Inquiry has a number of them now in an online forum: https://critinq.wordpress.com/2019/03/31/computational-literary-studies-a-critical-inquiry-online-forum/
@foureyedsoul Oh, thanks! Looking forward to reading the responses.
NOTICE: Registration on scholar.social is open to anyone who is willing to abide by our Community Standards. Email scholar dot social at protonmail dot com if you want an invite!
Scholar Social is a microblogging platform for researchers, grad students, librarians, archivists, undergrads, academically inclined high schoolers, educators of all levels, journal editors, research assistants, professors, administrators—anyone involved in academia who is willing to engage with others respectfully.
We strive to be a safe space for queer people and other minorities in academia, recognizing that there can only be academic freedom where the existence and validity of interlocutors' identities is taken as axiomatic.
"An academic microblog that you can be proud to put on the last slide of a presentation at a conference"
(Participation is, of course, optional)
Scholar Social features a monthly "official" journal club, in which we try to read and comment on a paper of interest.
Any user of Scholar Social can suggest an article by sending the DOI by direct message to @email@example.com and one will be chosen by random lottery on the last day of the month. We ask that you only submit articles that are from *outside* your own field of study to try to ensure that the papers we read are accessible and interesting to non-experts.