If you needed more reasons to be wary of Elsevier, here's what kind of data they collect about you. For example: whenever you do anything within Mendeley.

Reminder: Zotero is free, open-source and not owned by a giant company which sells your data.

the Mendeley tracking is the same as science direct as far as I can tell, and the js on science direct collects much more than this and transmits to way more endpoints than just Elsevier. I truly do not know how this kind of multi-endpoint tracking works with the GDPR, both multi-endpoint at time of collection and multi-endpoint by virtue of processing and cross-use and integration between subsidiaries in a conglomerate

@jonny I think you'd need a privacy lawyer to answer those questions.

@jaranta For this, I would like a button which is not ⭐ but more like 🪠.

Has anyone looked at connecting OJS or one of the other well-crafted open journal platforms to the Fedi?

Sorry if I wasn't clear!

(1) That was a thorough dissection of Elsevier, and it made me wish for a reaction button that meant: this is important, but not because it is good. Hence the emojis.

(2) OJS is the open journal system - . It's one of several platforms for open-source journals. I was wondering how to create alternatives to the ecosystem that lets Elsevier gather and commodify academic worker data.

@yetiinabox Gotcha. No OJS plugin that I know of – would be great!

@jaranta that was a good read, even though the subject obviously sucks

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Scholar Social

Scholar Social is a microblogging platform for researchers, grad students, librarians, archivists, undergrads, academically inclined high schoolers, educators of all levels, journal editors, research assistants, professors, administrators—anyone involved in academia who is willing to engage with others respectfully.