And in no way is that an accurate description of what Hume claimed. Hume was pretty skeptical that induction provided any knowledge at all. (And of course Hume's views are controversial.) He did think we needed perception for most of our knowledge, and all knowledge of fact (as opposed to what he called "relations of ideas".) Are you considering perception a form of induction? If so, you're using the word "induction" very nonstandardly.
The (standard) definition I use is that induction studies probabilistic inference, and deduction studies necessary entailments. Then inductive logic is more or less exhaused by probability theory. I was claiming that one cannot apply those laws without deductive rules. How would one apply Bayes' theorem without instantiating variables, etc.? This has nothing to do with brains.
But if you're using a different definition, we may just be talking past each other.
A number of younger academic philosophers in North America employ some weird convention regarding quotation marks I don't understand: single for mentioning expressions, double for "everything else", including direct quotation. I don't follow. Direct quotation *is* a form of mentioning, isn't it? Also, I cannot find any documentation for this convention anywhere. Anyone know about this?
@firstname.lastname@example.org It does! https://f-droid.org/en/packages/com.termux.widget/
I get that students might be tempted to enroll in a course even if they can't or don't want to attend its lectures regularly if they think they can self-learn, but what kind of madness would prompt them to email the professor directly and ask them if they think attending their lectures is "really necessary"?
I made this last night and thought it was really funny at the time. This morning I realize it's why 40-somethings shouldn't try to create memes. I blame .@SirCmpwn
@mprv The imap server is an ancient and almost completely neglected one at my university, and I don't have control over it. They moved all the new students over to gmail. The imap protocol doesn't support labels or tags -- it's a much older protocol -- but Thunderbird tries to proxy them with keywords. I don't think Geary does, or at least not in a compatible way.
Academics tend to share their work in either pdf or docx formats. Neither is remotely suitable in 2019. Pandoc's markdown, or maybe epub would be closer, but probably not right either. We need something platform/software/citation style independent, easily anonymizable, that supports comments. Does anyone use or know anything about TEI? I never hear it mentioned.
Friendly neighborhood Russellian.
I'm an academic philosopher and linux nerd, journal editor, and father.
NOTICE: Registration on scholar.social is open to anyone who is willing to abide by our Community Standards. Email scholar dot social at protonmail dot com if you want an invite!
Scholar Social is a microblogging platform for researchers, grad students, librarians, archivists, undergrads, academically inclined high schoolers, educators of all levels, journal editors, research assistants, professors, administrators—anyone involved in academia who is willing to engage with others respectfully.
We strive to be a safe space for queer people and other minorities in academia, recognizing that there can only be academic freedom where the existence and validity of interlocutors' identities is taken as axiomatic.
"An academic microblog that you can be proud to put on the last slide of a presentation at a conference"
(Participation is, of course, optional)
Scholar Social features a monthly "official" journal club, in which we try to read and comment on a paper of interest.
Any user of Scholar Social can suggest an article by sending the DOI by direct message to @email@example.com and one will be chosen by random lottery on the last day of the month. We ask that you only submit articles that are from *outside* your own field of study to try to ensure that the papers we read are accessible and interesting to non-experts.