I'm curious, does anyone else essentially keep a personal blacklist of journals? What causes them to land there?
@mplouffe Reasons for getting on my bad-journal list may include:
✅ Refusal to retract a paper that plagiarized me, even after acknowledging that it was indeed stolen
✅ Holding on to a submitted paper for 6 months and then desk-rejecting it without sending it out for review
✅ Low-impact venues that have much more demanding formatting requirements for initial submission than higher-impact ones
@bgcarlisle Do the latter two also apply to requests to review manuscripts?
@mplouffe I don't get a lot of those tbh
@bgcarlisle I don't either, but was thinking about this because I was asked to referee something yesterday and realized two of the journals on my list are there because of my experience as a reviewer.
@mplouffe Reviewing so far has been pretty straightforward for me at least
But then they've been hand-selected and advocated by my supervisor
So it's been a good experience
@bgcarlisle Most of the journals I've reviewed for have been great. In one case though, I was caught in a power struggle over gender representation on the editorial team. A couple of others have been downright rude or incompetent.
@mplouffe not yet
@mplouffe The only journal I would describe as blacklisted is one that has twice treated me badly, in my opinion, when it comes to reviewing my papers. I wouldn't review for them either.
There are others that I believe to be very slow and inefficient, so I prefer to try elsewhere.
@mplouffe heh, in my head?
NOTICE: Registration on scholar.social is open to anyone who is willing to abide by our Community Standards. Email scholar dot social at protonmail dot com if you want an invite!
Scholar Social is a microblogging platform for researchers, grad students, librarians, archivists, undergrads, academically inclined high schoolers, educators of all levels, journal editors, research assistants, professors, administrators—anyone involved in academia who is willing to engage with others respectfully.
We strive to be a safe space for queer people and other minorities in academia, recognizing that there can only be academic freedom where the existence and validity of interlocutors' identities is taken as axiomatic.
"An academic microblog that you can be proud to put on the last slide of a presentation at a conference"
(Participation is, of course, optional)
Scholar Social features a monthly "official" journal club, in which we try to read and comment on a paper of interest.
Any user of Scholar Social can suggest an article by sending the DOI by direct message to @firstname.lastname@example.org and one will be chosen by random lottery on the last day of the month. We ask that you only submit articles that are from *outside* your own field of study to try to ensure that the papers we read are accessible and interesting to non-experts.