Nicole Mirea @nimirea@scholar.social

Three days I have slogged, trying to figure out the answer to a very simple question:

How many times do you need to hear a new word accompanied by its referent before you can consistently pick out the referent, given the wordform?

It turns out that this depends on: similarity between referents, similarity between wordforms, and many other task-based factors. If I had more zeal I would propose a review article, if only to justify the slog time.

would really love a standardized, searchable database of all human behavioral experiments published

something with fields like:
- task
- measurement
- population
- independent variable

@glitterwitch here's a list of alternatives that's really helped me with eliminating ableist language (added bonus is that a lot of the alternatives are more specific to what you actually mean!): https://www.care2.com/causes/40-alternatives-to-these-ableist-and-oppressive-words.html

the Holy Trinity of writing about cognitive mechanisms/processes

language is a type of magic. you can *literally* transmit your private thoughts to other people

isn't that wild??????!??!

sure, sometimes it isn't 100% veridical, but the fact that we can do this type of thing *at all*, with concepts of arbitrary complexity, is... kind of amazing honestly

don't let anybody ever tell you you're not important enough to put 4 acceptable pronunciations of your name on your website

live yr dreams

@rusty There are some species of songbird that have "critical periods" for learning songs, and they learn those songs from other members of their species. this means that they develop dialects! also, if you keep them in isolation during the critical period (a few months after hatching), they'll develop abnormal songs (which will then become regularized by future generations!)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r5_ZSnFDPRg

if there's one hot tip i can give to past me: write summaries of EVERYTHING you read, as separate notes in the ref manager

it was one of those things that i knew i "should be doing" but it took a lot of time and sometimes i just wanted to get through the paper in time to make it to class, okay? but even just a 1-sentence takeaway helps

i'm digging up papers that i read 2 years ago and i'm *always* relieved when there's notes

The Yellowhammer Fund provides funding for anyone seeking care at one of Alabama's three abortion clinics and will help with other barriers to access (travel, lodging, etc.) as well as able.

Here's their website: https://yellowhammerfund.org/

And here's their Paypal: https://paypal.me/yellowfund
(updated w/ working link)

i should say, this was going around the tumblrs that I keep up with thru RSS a few days ago

A whole spreadsheet with examples of "specification gaming"—an AI agent hacking a reward function to find unexpected solutions: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/1/d/e/2PACX-1vRPiprOaC3HsCf5Tuum8bRfzYUiKLRqJmbOoC-32JorNdfyTiRRsR7Ea5eWtvsWzuxo8bjOxCG84dAg/pubhtml

fave: In a game meant to simulate the evolution of creatures, the programmer had to remove "a survival strategy where creatures could gain energy by suffocating themselves" (Schumacher, 2018)

in honor of this, i've made my repo public: https://github.com/nimirea/phonRNN

I got into ACL 2019 !!!!!

now to figure out how to afford to get to Florence

apparently my fonts were just, like, mis-specified this whole time and i had no idea because my default fonts were pretty

now with less Times New Roman!

https://www.nimirea.com

did something i've been threatening to do for Years and started a """professional blog"""

the first post is about git and social science

it has stills from Repo Man

https://www.nimirea.com/blog/2019/05/10/git-for-social-scientists/

used to be really impressed at really long lit reviews that cite like 50 papers. like how can you write multiple articles a *year* like that??

turns out these people have been citing the same 40 papers in every article, and just keeping up with the latest research and incorporating that as they go along

still impressed, but it doesn't seem impossible now :)

ok so i know there are at least a couple of people following me who live in LA. check this out:

https://act.eff.org/action/tell-the-city-council-to-put-the-brakes-on-ladot-s-rider-surveillance-program

basically, LADOT wants to force dockless mobility operators (scooter-/bike-share companies, like Lime and Bird) to send them realtime location data w/o being clear about how it'll use the data, how long it'll keep it, and the conditions on which it shares data with third parties (which it's already done).