So, we are studying 'Either/Or' (edited) by Kierkegaard. We are seeing each part separately and/but the teacher insists in calling everything from the book K's thinking. I have a feeling that analyzing this book as a collection of treaties (albeit an unusual one) and, therefore, as a coherent work in its parts, is problematic. I'm guessing that there is plenty written about this or about similar issues regarding K and /his/ works, does anybody know any references I can check? Thx
Hi there! I'm a 22 years old philosophy student from the Basque Country. I'm interested in language(s) and literature(s) but also in a bunch of other topics (still trying to figure out in what field I want to further my research). I speak Basque, French, Spanish and English.
Scholar Social is a microblogging platform for researchers, grad students, librarians, archivists, undergrads, academically inclined high schoolers, educators of all levels, journal editors, research assistants, professors, administrators—anyone involved in academia who is willing to engage with others respectfully. Read more ...