peer review, student journal, advice wanted 

I am reviewing a couple of papers for a student's journal at my old uni. One of them has a bunch of problems that could suggest rejection. However, I would rather just recommend a major revision. I don't like the idea of discouraging students, but I also don't want to be too lenient. What do you do in these cases?

peer review, student journal, advice wanted 

@okf Major revisions can be right. It can be difficult to know what the line is for that compared to reject. I would tend to do it only if I can say to the author what the revisions would be fairly clearly, and it's clear that that would be a better version of the current paper. Otherwise, it's just asking for a different paper and that should be a reject, I think.

Follow

peer review, student journal, advice wanted 

@twsh This is exactly right. I checked my notes again, and I realized that the revisions would amount to asking for a complete change of the goals of the paper. So I went for a rejection in the end (the part that I thought was salvageable could work outside of the paper's main framing idea).

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Scholar Social

Scholar Social is a microblogging platform for researchers, grad students, librarians, archivists, undergrads, academically inclined high schoolers, educators of all levels, journal editors, research assistants, professors, administrators—anyone involved in academia who is willing to engage with others respectfully.