RT @stewartbrand@twitter.com "Pinker’s book is not a case for the Enlightenment that invites refutation, but a refutation of the arguments of the counter-Enlightenment which, it turns out, have been wrong all along." twitter.com/QuilletteM/status/

Gold medal worthy acrobatics to argue “Enlightenment Now” isn’t making a case for the enlightenment. And if it’s supposed to refute any counter-enlightenment, that refutation is entirely focused on a misrepresentation of both the enlightenment and critiques of the enlightenment.

@omanreagan Thank you for the link to the book review in The Nation. It was...well...very enlightening to say the least. I’m starting to think Pinker is even more overrated than I’d originally thought. Then again, I tend to be wary of anyone who’s an evolutionary psychologist. That’s a bias I’m more than happy to live with.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Scholar Social

A Mastodon instance for academics

Scholar Social is meant for: researchers, grad students, librarians, archivists, undergrads, academically inclined high schoolers, educators of all levels, journal editors, research assistants, professors, administrators—anyone involved in academia who is willing to engage with others respectfully.

We strive to be a safe space for queer people and other minorities, recognizing that there can only be academic freedom where the existence and validity of interlocutors' identities is taken as axiomatic.

"A Mastodon profile you can be proud to put on the last slide of a presentation at a conference"

"Official" monthly journal club!

(Participation is, of course, optional)

Scholar Social features a monthly "official" journal club, in which we try to read and comment on a paper of interest.

Any user of Scholar Social can suggest an article by sending the DOI by direct message to @socrates@scholar.social and one will be chosen by random lottery on the last day of the month. We ask that you only submit articles that are from *outside* your own field of study to try to ensure that the papers we read are accessible and interesting to non-experts.

Read more ...