Two grad students and I are doing research on #mastodon and "the politics of federation," and so far for data/materials, we've collected: interviews with admins, 70 Masto threads on the topic, dozens of blog posts, and ~170 Masto CoC statements. It seems like a lot, but... what are we missing? Suggestions welcome!
@robertwgehl Random sample of tweets with matched random sample of toots from several different time periods (e.g. around major news events, etc.), label tweets and toots with metadata like "supports alt-right or Nazi philosophy", "contains racial slur," etc. and compare samples
@robertwgehl Take the list of instances from joinmastodon.com and choose a sample of toots weighted by the number of users or toots on that instance
@robertwgehl Other things you could possible code for:
* Does the post contain actual original content?
* Is the post a link to a news source with commentary?
* Is this a hot take on the topic of discussion du jour?
* Is the user posting this identified as a bot?
* Does the user claim to be an individual or a Brand™?
Scholar Social is meant for: researchers, grad students, librarians, archivists, undergrads, academically inclined high schoolers, educators of all levels, journal editors, research assistants, professors, administrators—anyone involved in academia who is willing to engage with others respectfully.
We strive to be a safe space for queer people and other minorities, recognizing that there can only be academic freedom where the existence and validity of interlocutors' identities is taken as axiomatic.
"A Mastodon profile you can be proud to put on the last slide of a presentation at a conference"
(Participation is, of course, optional)
Scholar Social features a monthly "official" journal club, in which we try to read and comment on a paper of interest.
Any user of Scholar Social can suggest an article by sending the DOI by direct message to @email@example.com and one will be chosen by random lottery on the last day of the month. We ask that you only submit articles that are from *outside* your own field of study to try to ensure that the papers we read are accessible and interesting to non-experts.