What should I read to understand digital humanities, and find out how a philosopher can contribute and/or benefit from them?
I know that's a broad question.
@twsh mcluhan probably
@twsh Ages ago, I took humanities electives at MIT, where there was (and I think still is) a strong Comparative Media Studies presence. One semeser, I did Shakespeare in Film with Pete Donaldson (https://lit.mit.edu/people/pdonaldson/#tab=t1), where we tried out experimental software for DVD annotation. Another term, I took "nonlinear and interactive narrative" (as I think it was called), where we covered early experiments in hypertext fiction (e.g., "Victory Garden").
@twsh Somehow, I never took a course with Henry Jenkins, who is probably the best-known member of the department for his writing on "fan studies".
@twsh @webmind @bgcarlisle I'm classified as being a doctoral student in digital humanities: for my group at least, the term is used for any humanities work that utilises tech, though often more specifically using tech to do things you can't do manually/designing bespoke software for humanities work.
I've really liked the two syllabi Ted Underwood pulled together on the two aspects of DH, as a social phenomenon and as a set of technical methods and tools
@twsh It's a seemingly simple question, but even those who are digital humanists can spend a lot of time arguing about what it is. I think the wikipedia article is pretty good https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_humanities
Personally, I like the perspective that Matt Kirschenbaum puts forward here http://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/debates/text/38
@twsh can you clarify what you mean by "digital humanities" and exactly what sort of reading material you are looking for?
@strypey Part of my question is trying to figure out what I ought to mean by 'digital humanities'.
Scholar Social is a microblogging platform for researchers, grad students, librarians, archivists, undergrads, academically inclined high schoolers, educators of all levels, journal editors, research assistants, professors, administrators—anyone involved in academia who is willing to engage with others respectfully.
We strive to be a safe space for queer people and other minorities in academia, recognizing that there can only be academic freedom where the existence and validity of interlocutors' identities is taken as axiomatic.
"An academic microblog that you can be proud to put on the last slide of a presentation at a conference"
(Participation is, of course, optional)
Scholar Social features a monthly "official" journal club, in which we try to read and comment on a paper of interest.
Any user of Scholar Social can suggest an article by sending the DOI by direct message to @email@example.com and one will be chosen by random lottery on the last day of the month. We ask that you only submit articles that are from *outside* your own field of study to try to ensure that the papers we read are accessible and interesting to non-experts.