not sure if my instincts are off so lmk how you all feel about this: "in a hypothetical federated git platform, i would like it if conversations in a repository (eg issues and pull requests) were stored directly in the repository as opposed to in a database on the server"

boosts appreciated

@nasser @technomancy I like the idea, but I’d need convincing given how git likes commits to be immutable(-ish). Opens up whole new forms of abuse.

@a @technomancy that's totally fair. every conversation becomes a "forever conversation" by default. I certainly don't expect the current GitHub workflow, where any random person with an account can wander into a repository and leave comments, could work in this scheme. I think the author of the repository would be empowered to merge or not merge comment branches from other people? the same way random people can't just push code into your repository? it's not totally clear.


@nasser @a @technomancy this is pretty much exactly why I said it depends 👍🏻

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Scholar Social

Scholar Social is a microblogging platform for researchers, grad students, librarians, archivists, undergrads, academically inclined high schoolers, educators of all levels, journal editors, research assistants, professors, administrators—anyone involved in academia who is willing to engage with others respectfully.