I have added "no institutional accounts" to our Community Standards, because periodically an organization or a school or something tries to set up shop on Scholar, and they invariably spam the Local Timeline with nothing but links back to their Twitter account
If you are a member on Scholar and you have a compelling reason why this is a bad policy, I'm legitimately open to discussion
If you are not a member of Scholar, please do not interact, thanks
@JubalBarca @socrates musing - I've debated a few times setting up an account for Open Life Science (openlifesci.org), an organisation I co-run, and largely haven't because of exactly this concern - I don't have time to do more than link back to twitter. I kind of like the idea of being _able_ to toot on behalf of OLS, but I also feel like probably I could negotiate / re-open that discussion if I ever got the energy to actually curate original content for OLS
@yoyehudi @JubalBarca Yeah, it's tricky because—where to draw the line between "member of the community who's really excited about something" vs "spam from a rando who just wants to advertise their Twitter and tell us about their Brand"?
And I guess in some ways we're all "cultivating a brand" if you want to think of it in those terms (I really don't)
Maybe a better policy is—"group" accounts are allowed for Scholar members who want to speak with a different voice?
Scholar Social is a microblogging platform for researchers, grad students, librarians, archivists, undergrads, academically inclined high schoolers, educators of all levels, journal editors, research assistants, professors, administrators—anyone involved in academia who is willing to engage with others respectfully.