All too often I hear "how can we justify funds to maintain research software?"
But really, we should be asking "How can we justify _not_ funding it?"
My colleagues and I wrote a thing: https://www.nature.com/articles/s43588-021-00048-5
@yoyehudi I see a conflict here between two principles: In the past years many scientists managed to break free of proprietary software (matlab as prime example), but the result was that money that went into licensing wasn’t re-allocated to maintaining free software tools, but instead was allocated elsewhere.
This needs to change: Paying for free software solutions needs to become the norm for research institutions.
@yoyehudi very interesting piece.
Gave me some food for thought in my current process of migration/establishment into an UK-based applied uni and creation of a research group on applied software engineering.
@yoyehudi I'm royally pissed off by the fact that researchers are continually made to justify the cost of their work and their own existence even.
Thank you & colleagues for the write up!
Scholar Social is a microblogging platform for researchers, grad students, librarians, archivists, undergrads, academically inclined high schoolers, educators of all levels, journal editors, research assistants, professors, administrators—anyone involved in academia who is willing to engage with others respectfully.